1952 Jaguar XK vs. 1968 ZAZ 966

To start off, 1968 ZAZ 966 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar XK (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1968 ZAZ 966. (38 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1968 ZAZ 966. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Jaguar XK weights approximately 521 kg more than 1968 ZAZ 966. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 218 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 ZAZ 966. (72 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 ZAZ 966.

Compare all specifications:

1952 Jaguar XK 1968 ZAZ 966
Make Jaguar ZAZ
Model XK 966
Year Released 1952 1968
Engine Position Front Rear
Engine Size 3441 cc 1196 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 158 HP 38 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 4400 RPM
Torque 290 Nm 72 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 2900 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1295 kg 774 kg
Vehicle Length 4430 mm 3740 mm
Vehicle Width 1570 mm 1540 mm
Vehicle Height 1340 mm 1380 mm
Wheelbase Size 2600 mm 2170 mm