1952 Jaguar XK vs. 1981 Audi 4000
To start off, 1981 Audi 4000 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar XK (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1981 Audi 4000. (100 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1981 Audi 4000.
Because 1981 Audi 4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Audi 4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Audi 4000. (137 Nm). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Audi 4000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Jaguar XK | 1981 Audi 4000 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Audi |
| Model | XK | 4000 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3441 cc | 2144 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Torque | 290 Nm | 137 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 79.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 86.4 mm |
| Top Speed | 201 km/hour | 168 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2550 mm |
