1952 Jaguar XK vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 1981 Zastava 102 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar XK (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Jaguar XK weights approximately 521 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Zastava 102, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Jaguar XK | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Zastava |
| Model | XK | 102 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 3441 cc | 1302 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 774 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2160 mm |
