1952 Jaguar XK vs. 1983 Plymouth Reliant
To start off, 1983 Plymouth Reliant is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Plymouth Reliant is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1952 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Plymouth Reliant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jaguar XK | 1983 Plymouth Reliant | |
Make | Jaguar | Plymouth |
Model | XK | Reliant |
Year Released | 1952 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1993 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2260 mm |