1952 Jaguar XK vs. 1985 Jeep CJ
To start off, 1985 Jeep CJ is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar XK (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1985 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1985 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Jeep CJ weights approximately 1 kg more than 1952 Jaguar XK.
Because 1985 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Jeep CJ. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jaguar XK | 1985 Jeep CJ | |
Make | Jaguar | Jeep |
Model | XK | CJ |
Year Released | 1952 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3441 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 290 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1296 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2380 mm |