1952 Jaguar XK vs. 1985 Lancia Y10
To start off, 1985 Lancia Y10 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar XK (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1985 Lancia Y10. (54 HP @ 5850 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1985 Lancia Y10.
Because 1952 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Lancia Y10, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 209 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Lancia Y10. (81 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Lancia Y10.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Jaguar XK | 1985 Lancia Y10 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Lancia |
| Model | XK | Y10 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1985 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3441 cc | 1049 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 54 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5850 RPM |
| Torque | 290 Nm | 81 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1510 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1250 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2170 mm |
