1952 Jaguar XK vs. 1988 Renault 25
To start off, 1988 Renault 25 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar XK (158 HP) has 68 more horse power than 1988 Renault 25. (90 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1988 Renault 25.
Because 1952 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Renault 25, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Renault 25. (181 Nm). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Renault 25.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jaguar XK | 1988 Renault 25 | |
Make | Jaguar | Renault |
Model | XK | 25 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3441 cc | 2068 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 90 HP |
Torque | 290 Nm | 181 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 89 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2730 mm |