1952 Jaguar XK vs. 1995 Rover MGF
To start off, 1995 Rover MGF is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar XK (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1995 Rover MGF. (145 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1995 Rover MGF. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Rover MGF weights approximately 229 kg more than 1952 Jaguar XK.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover MGF. (236 Nm). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover MGF.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jaguar XK | 1995 Rover MGF | |
Make | Jaguar | Rover |
Model | XK | MGF |
Year Released | 1952 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3441 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Torque | 290 Nm | 236 Nm |
Top Speed | 201 km/hour | 210 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1524 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1280 mm |