1952 Jaguar XK vs. 1996 Volkswagen Passat
To start off, 1996 Volkswagen Passat is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar XK (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1996 Volkswagen Passat. (150 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1996 Volkswagen Passat.
Because 1952 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Volkswagen Passat, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Volkswagen Passat. (210 Nm). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Volkswagen Passat.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jaguar XK | 1996 Volkswagen Passat | |
Make | Jaguar | Volkswagen |
Model | XK | Passat |
Year Released | 1952 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3441 cc | 2324 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 290 Nm | 210 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 90.2 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2710 mm |