1952 Jaguar XK vs. 1997 MCC Smart
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar XK (158 HP) has 105 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Jaguar XK weights approximately 645 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Jaguar XK | 1997 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Jaguar | MCC |
| Model | XK | Smart |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3441 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 53 HP |
| Top Speed | 201 km/hour | 129 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1460 mm |
