1952 Jaguar XK vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 1998 Renault Clio is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Jaguar XK weights approximately 360 kg more than 1998 Renault Clio.
Because 1952 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jaguar XK | 1998 Renault Clio | |
Make | Jaguar | Renault |
Model | XK | Clio |
Year Released | 1952 | 1998 |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 201 km/hour | 181 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 935 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 50 L |