1952 Jaguar XK vs. 1999 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 1999 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 4,554 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1999 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Land Rover Range Rover (407 Nm) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Jaguar XK. (290 Nm). This means 1999 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Jaguar XK.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jaguar XK | 1999 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Jaguar | Land Rover |
Model | XK | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1952 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3441 cc | 4554 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 290 Nm | 407 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2550 mm |