1952 Jaguar XK vs. 1999 Opel Omega

To start off, 1999 Opel Omega is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar XK (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1999 Opel Omega. (123 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1999 Opel Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Opel Omega weights approximately 375 kg more than 1952 Jaguar XK.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Opel Omega. (270 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Opel Omega.

Compare all specifications:

1952 Jaguar XK 1999 Opel Omega
Make Jaguar Opel
Model XK Omega
Year Released 1952 1999
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3441 cc 2171 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 158 HP 123 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 290 Nm 270 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 1600 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83 mm 84.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 106 mm 98 mm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1295 kg 1670 kg
Vehicle Length 4430 mm 4900 mm
Vehicle Width 1570 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1340 mm 1460 mm
Wheelbase Size 2600 mm 2610 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 75 L