1952 Jaguar XK vs. 2000 Lada Vaz
To start off, 2000 Lada Vaz is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar XK (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 2000 Lada Vaz. (81 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2000 Lada Vaz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Jaguar XK weights approximately 250 kg more than 2000 Lada Vaz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Lada Vaz is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Lada Vaz will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lada Vaz. (117 Nm). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lada Vaz.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Jaguar XK | 2000 Lada Vaz | |
| Make | Jaguar | Lada |
| Model | XK | Vaz |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3441 cc | 1999 cc |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 290 Nm | 117 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1045 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2500 mm |
