1952 Jaguar XK vs. 2000 Suzuki XL6
To start off, 2000 Suzuki XL6 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar XK (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 2000 Suzuki XL6. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2000 Suzuki XL6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Suzuki XL6 weights approximately 150 kg more than 1952 Jaguar XK.
Because 2000 Suzuki XL6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Suzuki XL6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Suzuki XL6. (218 Nm). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Suzuki XL6.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Jaguar XK | 2000 Suzuki XL6 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Suzuki |
| Model | XK | XL6 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3441 cc | 2501 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 70 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 290 Nm | 218 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1445 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4190 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2490 mm |
