1952 Jaguar XK vs. 2001 Lancia Nea
To start off, 2001 Lancia Nea is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar XK (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2001 Lancia Nea. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2001 Lancia Nea. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Lancia Nea weights approximately 75 kg more than 1952 Jaguar XK.
Because 1952 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Nea, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Lancia Nea (314 Nm) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Jaguar XK. (290 Nm). This means 2001 Lancia Nea will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Jaguar XK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Jaguar XK | 2001 Lancia Nea | |
| Make | Jaguar | Lancia |
| Model | XK | Nea |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3441 cc | 2445 cc |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 290 Nm | 314 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1370 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2590 mm |
