1952 Jaguar XK vs. 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer weights approximately 610 kg more than 1952 Jaguar XK.
Because 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer (382 Nm) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Jaguar XK. (290 Nm). This means 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Jaguar XK.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jaguar XK | 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | Jaguar | Mitsubishi |
Model | XK | Lancer |
Year Released | 1952 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3441 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 290 Nm | 382 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 85.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 87.9 mm |
Top Speed | 201 km/hour | 254 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1905 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 71 L |