1952 Jaguar XK vs. 2001 Renault Clio

To start off, 2001 Renault Clio is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Renault Clio (230 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1952 Jaguar XK. (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1952 Jaguar XK. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Renault Clio weights approximately 405 kg more than 1952 Jaguar XK. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Renault Clio. (105 Nm). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Renault Clio.

Compare all specifications:

1952 Jaguar XK 2001 Renault Clio
Make Jaguar Renault
Model XK Clio
Year Released 1952 2001
Engine Position Front Middle
Engine Size 3441 cc 2946 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 158 HP 230 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 5250 RPM
Torque 290 Nm 105 Nm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Doors 2 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1295 kg 1700 kg
Vehicle Length 4430 mm 3820 mm
Vehicle Width 1570 mm 1810 mm
Vehicle Height 1340 mm 1380 mm
Wheelbase Size 2600 mm 2750 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 60 L