1952 Jaguar XK vs. 2002 BMW X5
To start off, 2002 BMW X5 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW X5 (226 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1952 Jaguar XK. (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1952 Jaguar XK. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW X5 weights approximately 320 kg more than 1952 Jaguar XK. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 290 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jaguar XK | 2002 BMW X5 | |
Make | Jaguar | BMW |
Model | XK | X5 |
Year Released | 1952 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3441 cc | 2926 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 226 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 7400 RPM |
Torque | 290 Nm | 290 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1615 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2890 mm |