1952 Jaguar XK vs. 2002 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2002 Ford Ranger is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar XK (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2002 Ford Ranger. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Ranger weights approximately 425 kg more than 1952 Jaguar XK.
Because 2002 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Ranger. (207 Nm). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jaguar XK | 2002 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Jaguar | Ford |
Model | XK | Ranger |
Year Released | 1952 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3441 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 290 Nm | 207 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 55 L |