1952 Jaguar XK vs. 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo
To start off, 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Jaguar XK weights approximately 125 kg more than 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo.
Because 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jaguar XK | 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo | |
Make | Jaguar | Mitsubishi |
Model | XK | Dingo |
Year Released | 1952 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3441 cc | 1300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2450 mm |