1952 Jaguar XK vs. 2003 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2003 Ford Ranger is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Ranger weights approximately 425 kg more than 1952 Jaguar XK.
Because 2003 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jaguar XK | 2003 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Jaguar | Ford |
Model | XK | Ranger |
Year Released | 1952 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3441 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3010 mm |