1952 Jaguar XK vs. 2003 Ford Windstar
To start off, 2003 Ford Windstar is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar XK (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2003 Ford Windstar. (150 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Windstar.
Because 1952 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Jaguar XK | 2003 Ford Windstar | |
| Make | Jaguar | Ford |
| Model | XK | Windstar |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3441 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5103 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1946 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3066 mm |
