1952 Jaguar XK vs. 2003 Mahindra CL
To start off, 2003 Mahindra CL is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar XK (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 2003 Mahindra CL. (62 HP @ 3200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2003 Mahindra CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mahindra CL weights approximately 7 kg more than 1952 Jaguar XK.
Because 2003 Mahindra CL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mahindra CL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mahindra CL. (165 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mahindra CL.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Jaguar XK | 2003 Mahindra CL | |
| Make | Jaguar | Mahindra |
| Model | XK | CL |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3441 cc | 2523 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Torque | 290 Nm | 165 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1302 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2040 mm |
