1952 Jaguar XK vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar XK (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 50 kg more than 1952 Jaguar XK.
Because 1952 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 6. (240 Nm). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jaguar XK | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | XK | 6 |
Year Released | 1952 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3441 cc | 1594 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 290 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 201 km/hour | 185 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2610 mm |