1952 Jaguar XK vs. 2003 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2003 Toyota Condor is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar XK (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2003 Toyota Condor. (108 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2003 Toyota Condor. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Toyota Condor weights approximately 210 kg more than 1952 Jaguar XK.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Toyota Condor. (192 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Toyota Condor.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jaguar XK | 2003 Toyota Condor | |
Make | Jaguar | Toyota |
Model | XK | Condor |
Year Released | 1952 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3441 cc | 2437 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 290 Nm | 192 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 86 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1505 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 70 L |