1952 Jaguar XK vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander (162 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1952 Jaguar XK. (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1952 Jaguar XK. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 175 kg more than 1952 Jaguar XK. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. (215 Nm). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jaguar XK | 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Jaguar | Mitsubishi |
Model | XK | Outlander |
Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3441 cc | 2343 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 162 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 290 Nm | 215 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 100 mm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 59 L |