1952 Jaguar XK vs. 2004 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2004 Toyota Tundra is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,376 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jaguar XK | 2004 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Jaguar | Toyota |
Model | XK | Tundra |
Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1993 cc | 3376 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 190 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3270 mm |