1952 Jaguar XK vs. 2004 Volkswagen Concept C
To start off, 2004 Volkswagen Concept C is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar XK (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2004 Volkswagen Concept C. (148 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2004 Volkswagen Concept C.
Because 1952 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volkswagen Concept C, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Volkswagen Concept C. (200 Nm). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Volkswagen Concept C.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jaguar XK | 2004 Volkswagen Concept C | |
Make | Jaguar | Volkswagen |
Model | XK | Concept C |
Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3441 cc | 1983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 290 Nm | 200 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 82.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 92.8 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1440 mm |