1952 Jaguar XK vs. 2005 Land Rover Freelander
To start off, 2005 Land Rover Freelander is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Land Rover Freelander (174 HP) has 16 more horse power than 1952 Jaguar XK. (158 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Freelander should accelerate faster than 1952 Jaguar XK.
Because 2005 Land Rover Freelander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Freelander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Land Rover Freelander. (240 Nm). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Land Rover Freelander.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jaguar XK | 2005 Land Rover Freelander | |
Make | Jaguar | Land Rover |
Model | XK | Freelander |
Year Released | 1952 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3441 cc | 2489 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 174 HP |
Torque | 290 Nm | 240 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 83 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 64 L |