1952 Jaguar XK vs. 2005 Mazda Tribute

To start off, 2005 Mazda Tribute is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar XK (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2005 Mazda Tribute. (155 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda Tribute. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 223 kg more than 1952 Jaguar XK.

Because 2005 Mazda Tribute is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda Tribute will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda Tribute. (206 Nm). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda Tribute.

Compare all specifications:

1952 Jaguar XK 2005 Mazda Tribute
Make Jaguar Mazda
Model XK Tribute
Year Released 1952 2005
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3441 cc 2262 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 158 HP 155 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 290 Nm 206 Nm
Engine Bore Size 83 mm 87 mm
Engine Stroke Size 106 mm 94 mm
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1295 kg 1518 kg
Vehicle Length 4430 mm 4440 mm
Vehicle Width 1570 mm 1840 mm
Vehicle Height 1340 mm 1780 mm
Wheelbase Size 2600 mm 2630 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 62 L