1952 Jaguar XK vs. 2005 Mercedes-Benz R
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz R is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 2,987 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercedes-Benz R is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2005 Mercedes-Benz R is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz R will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jaguar XK | 2005 Mercedes-Benz R | |
Make | Jaguar | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | XK | R |
Year Released | 1952 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1993 cc | 2987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 221 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3220 mm |