1952 Jaguar XK vs. 2005 Mercury Mountaineer
To start off, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercury Mountaineer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer (210 HP) has 52 more horse power than 1952 Jaguar XK. (158 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer should accelerate faster than 1952 Jaguar XK. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Mountaineer weights approximately 622 kg more than 1952 Jaguar XK. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer (344 Nm) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Jaguar XK. (290 Nm). This means 2005 Mercury Mountaineer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Jaguar XK.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jaguar XK | 2005 Mercury Mountaineer | |
Make | Jaguar | Mercury |
Model | XK | Mountaineer |
Year Released | 1952 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3441 cc | 4015 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 210 HP |
Torque | 290 Nm | 344 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 84 mm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1917 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 85 L |