1952 Jaguar XK vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher.
Because 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jaguar XK | 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie | |
Make | Jaguar | Mitsubishi |
Model | XK | Nessie |
Year Released | 1952 | 2005 |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2790 mm |