1952 Jaguar XK vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 158 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 175 kg more than 1952 Jaguar XK.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. (220 Nm). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jaguar XK | 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Jaguar | Mitsubishi |
Model | XK | Outlander |
Year Released | 1952 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3441 cc | 2343 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 290 Nm | 220 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 100 mm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 59 L |