1952 Jaguar XK vs. 2005 Renault Megane
To start off, 2005 Renault Megane is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar XK (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2005 Renault Megane. (133 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Megane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Megane weights approximately 405 kg more than 1952 Jaguar XK.
Because 1952 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Megane. (105 Nm). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jaguar XK | 2005 Renault Megane | |
Make | Jaguar | Renault |
Model | XK | Megane |
Year Released | 1952 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3441 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 133 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 290 Nm | 105 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1700 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 70 L |