1952 Jaguar XK vs. 2005 Saab 9000
To start off, 2005 Saab 9000 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar XK (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2005 Saab 9000. (118 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2005 Saab 9000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Saab 9000 weights approximately 235 kg more than 1952 Jaguar XK.
Because 1952 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Saab 9000, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Saab 9000. (280 Nm). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Saab 9000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Jaguar XK | 2005 Saab 9000 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Saab |
| Model | XK | 9000 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3441 cc | 2290 cc |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 290 Nm | 280 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1530 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2710 mm |
