1952 Jaguar XK vs. 2005 Smart Coupe
To start off, 2005 Smart Coupe is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar XK (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 2005 Smart Coupe. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2005 Smart Coupe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Jaguar XK weights approximately 565 kg more than 2005 Smart Coupe. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Smart Coupe. (95 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Smart Coupe.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Jaguar XK | 2005 Smart Coupe | |
| Make | Jaguar | Smart |
| Model | XK | Coupe |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 3441 cc | 698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 290 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Top Speed | 201 km/hour | 135 km/hour |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 730 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 1820 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 33 L |
