1952 Jaguar XK vs. 2005 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2005 Smart ForTwo is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar XK (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 2005 Smart ForTwo. (74 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2005 Smart ForTwo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Smart ForTwo. (110 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Smart ForTwo.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jaguar XK | 2005 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Jaguar | Smart |
Model | XK | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1952 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3441 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 290 Nm | 110 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 201 km/hour | 145 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1520 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 1820 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 33 L |