1952 Jaguar XK vs. 2005 Toyota Opa
To start off, 2005 Toyota Opa is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Jaguar XK weights approximately 95 kg more than 2005 Toyota Opa.
Because 2005 Toyota Opa is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Opa will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jaguar XK | 2005 Toyota Opa | |
Make | Jaguar | Toyota |
Model | XK | Opa |
Year Released | 1952 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3441 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1530 mm |