1952 Jaguar XK vs. 2006 Peugeot 207
To start off, 2006 Peugeot 207 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar XK (158 HP) has 91 more horse power than 2006 Peugeot 207. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2006 Peugeot 207.
Because 1952 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Peugeot 207, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Peugeot 207. (160 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Peugeot 207.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Jaguar XK | 2006 Peugeot 207 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Peugeot |
| Model | XK | 207 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3441 cc | 1358 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 67 HP |
| Torque | 290 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1670 mm |
