1952 Jaguar XK vs. 2006 Toyota Ractis
To start off, 2006 Toyota Ractis is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1952 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Ractis, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Toyota Ractis. (158 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Toyota Ractis.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jaguar XK | 2006 Toyota Ractis | |
Make | Jaguar | Toyota |
Model | XK | Ractis |
Year Released | 1952 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3441 cc | 1299 cc |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 290 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1780 mm |