1952 Jaguar XK vs. 2007 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2007 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (250 HP) has 92 more horse power than 1952 Jaguar XK. (158 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1952 Jaguar XK.
Because 1952 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (325 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Jaguar XK. (290 Nm). This means 2007 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Jaguar XK.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jaguar XK | 2007 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | XK | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1952 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3441 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 250 HP |
Torque | 290 Nm | 325 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2880 mm |