1952 Jaguar XK vs. 2008 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2008 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jaguar XK | 2008 Jeep Commander | |
Make | Jaguar | Jeep |
Model | XK | Commander |
Year Released | 1952 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3441 cc | 5654 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 80 L |