1952 Jaguar XK vs. 2008 Lexus LS
To start off, 2008 Lexus LS is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 4,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Lexus LS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Lexus LS weights approximately 445 kg more than 1952 Jaguar XK.
Because 2008 Lexus LS is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Lexus LS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jaguar XK | 2008 Lexus LS | |
Make | Jaguar | Lexus |
Model | XK | LS |
Year Released | 1952 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3441 cc | 4965 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3100 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 84 L |