1952 Jaguar XK vs. 2008 Nissan Livina
To start off, 2008 Nissan Livina is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Livina weights approximately 1110 kg more than 1952 Jaguar XK.
Because 1952 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Livina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Nissan Livina. (153 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Nissan Livina.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jaguar XK | 2008 Nissan Livina | |
Make | Jaguar | Nissan |
Model | XK | Livina |
Year Released | 1952 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3441 cc | 1598 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 290 Nm | 153 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 201 km/hour | 180 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 2405 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 52 L |