1952 Jaguar XK vs. 2008 Opel Movano
To start off, 2008 Opel Movano is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Opel Movano weights approximately 594 kg more than 1952 Jaguar XK.
Because 1952 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Opel Movano, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 290 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jaguar XK | 2008 Opel Movano | |
Make | Jaguar | Opel |
Model | XK | Movano |
Year Released | 1952 | 2008 |
Engine Size | 3441 cc | 2462 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 290 Nm | 290 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 99 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Top Speed | 201 km/hour | 145 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1889 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 100 L |