1952 Jaguar XK vs. 2009 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2009 Holden Cruze is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar XK (158 HP) has 10 more horse power than 2009 Holden Cruze. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2009 Holden Cruze.
Because 1952 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Cruze (320 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Jaguar XK. (290 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Jaguar XK.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jaguar XK | 2009 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Jaguar | Holden |
Model | XK | Cruze |
Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3441 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 290 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2685 mm |