1952 Jaguar XK vs. 2009 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,727 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (268 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1952 Jaguar XK. (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1952 Jaguar XK.
Because 1952 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda CX-9. (269 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda CX-9.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jaguar XK | 2009 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | XK | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3441 cc | 3727 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 268 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 290 Nm | 269 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2340 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 76 L |