1952 Jaguar XK vs. 2010 Aston Martin One-77
To start off, 2010 Aston Martin One-77 is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 7,300 cc (12 cylinders), 2010 Aston Martin One-77 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Aston Martin One-77 (750 HP) has 592 more horse power than 1952 Jaguar XK. (158 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Aston Martin One-77 should accelerate faster than 1952 Jaguar XK. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Aston Martin One-77 weights approximately 335 kg more than 1952 Jaguar XK. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Aston Martin One-77 (750 Nm) has 460 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Jaguar XK. (290 Nm). This means 2010 Aston Martin One-77 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Jaguar XK.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Jaguar XK | 2010 Aston Martin One-77 | |
Make | Jaguar | Aston Martin |
Model | XK | One-77 |
Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3441 cc | 7300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 750 HP |
Torque | 290 Nm | 750 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 201 km/hour | 354 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1630 kg |